Did the economy grow 3.7% last quarter, or 0.6%?  In Eric Morath's article " By Another Measure, U.S. Economic Growth Has Nearly Stalled This Year", published in the Wall Street Journal. 

"A big upward revision to gross domestic product, now seen increasing at a 3.7% pace in the second quarter, has reassured some economists that the economy is on solid footing heading into the second half of the year.
But a less closely watched number in the Commerce Department report provides a fair amount of caution.
An alternative measure of economic output, gross domestic income, advanced at a much slower 0.6% pace last quarter. By that gauge, economic growth barely inched ahead in the first half of the year. (GDI advanced at 0.4% pace in the first quarter versus a 0.6% increase for GDP.)"


Both the GDI and GDP measure the size of the economy. 
   GDP measures production based on what is spent by consumers, businesses and governments
   GDI measures the income (wages, corporate profits, taxes) generated from production.

They should be the same - why aren't they? Could government spending and postponed consumer spending be fueling GDP while the variables in GDI have not changed at the same rate? If corporations were selling more and not passing along to workers in the form of wages then wages wouldn't rise but corporate profits would.  


Could it be 'the experiments' like Kansas no small business tax and tax breaks for relocation be causing this difference?